U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
Skip to main content

Last updated

The Surgical Pause

Share Print

Data demonstrate there is no such thing as low risk surgery in high risk, frail patients; in fact, 1 in 3 frail Veterans will die within 6 months of even “small surgery”. Historically, there was no reliable and quick way to identify the highest risk patients at the point of care before committing to a surgical plan. Recognized as a Promising Practice by the VHA Innovation Ecosystem’s Diffusion of Excellence, the Surgical Pause utilizes the simple yet sophisticated Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to screen Veterans for frailty in 30 seconds, effectively flagging high risk Veterans so that the surgical team can ensure that the proposed treatment plans both mitigate known risks and align with the Veterans’ overarching life goals. Transparent communication about the risks of protracted recovery or loss of independence after surgery empowers patients to consider non-operative management strategies. And for those who nonetheless elect surgical intervention, preoperative exercise training for as little as 3-6 weeks before surgery may improve outcomes by increasing physiologic reserve. By bringing additional resources to such frail patients, the Surgical Pause improves outcomes and adds value.

This innovation is scaling widely with the support of national stakeholders. See more scaling innovations.

Adoptions:

42 successful, 33 in-progress

Awards and Recognition:

Part of SAGE QUERI Program (VISN 4) , Focus of the PAUSE Trial (HSR&D funded multi-site study), Diffusion of Excellence Promising Practice, Aligned with 4- Year HSR&D Funded Merit ... Part of SAGE QUERI Program (VISN 4) , Focus of the PAUSE Trial (HSR&D funded multi-site study), Diffusion of Excellence Promising Practice, Aligned with 4- Year HSR&D Funded Merit Review Project aimed at Improving Surgical Decision Making by Measuring and Predicting Long-Term Loss of Independence after Surgery, QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative

Partners:

Diffusion of Excellence, Health Services Research & Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Contact Team

Overview

Problem

Data demonstrate that there is no such thing as low risk surgery in high risk, frail patients. Surgeons typically consider as “high risk” any surgery with more than 1% 30-day mortality. But among the frail, even low stress surgeries result in mortality rates significantly higher than 1%. And when the patient is very frail, as many as 1 in 3 die within 6 mont ... See more

Images

There is no such thing as a low risk surgery for frail patients

Videos

Watch Dr. Hall’s iEX Talk about the Surgical Pause at the 2021 VHA Innovation Experience

Solution

Step 1: Measure patient frailty with the Risk Analysis (RAI) for every patient considering elective surgery. It takes only 30 seconds to complete before a patient meets their surgeon, and it effectively flags high risk patients so that surgeons and their patients can make informed, shared decisions about the treatment plan, surgical or otherwise, that is mos ... See more

Results

Interdisciplinary review of the care plan at the Omaha VAMC cut mortality among the frail from 25-8%, a 3-fold survival advantage. Preoperative goal clarification changed the care plan in Pittsburgh: 1 in 5 patients declined surgery in favor of non-operative management strategies. And exercise training for as little as 3 weeks before surgery achieved clinica ... See more

Images

Interrupted Time Sequence analysis with segmented Poisson regression among 28,786 surgical patients (14,127 before frailty screening; 5402 after). 1-year mortality decreased 0.2% per month following RAI Implementation (p=0.02) Rat of improvement increased to 0.87% per month after implementing Best Practice Alerts (BPAs) for frail patients.

Metrics

  • Length of Stay
  • Post-Operative Complications
  • Post-Operative Readmission
  • Decision Regret
  • Patient Centeredness of Care
  • Cost
  • Post-Operative Mortality

Diffusion tracker

Does not include Clinical Resource Hubs (CRH)

Statuses

AL: Birmingham VA Medical Center (Birmingham, Alabama) AZ: Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Phoenix, Arizona) CA: Palo Alto VA Medical Center (Palo Alto, California)
  • Started adoption on 07/2021.
CA: West Los Angeles VA Medical Center (West Los Angeles) DE: Wilmington VA Medical Center (Wilmington, Delaware)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
FL: Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Miami)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
FL: C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Bay Pines)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
FL: James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (Tampa, Florida)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
FL: Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Gainesville) FL: Orlando VA Medical Center (Orlando)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
FL: West Palm Beach VA Medical Center (West Palm Beach)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
GA: Joseph Maxwell Cleland Atlanta VA Medical Center (Atlanta, Georgia) IA: Iowa City VA Medical Center (Iowa City, Iowa)
  • Started adoption on 01/2020.
IL: Edward Hines Junior Hospital (Hines) IL: Jesse Brown Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Chicago, Illinois)
  • Started adoption on 06/2021.
IN: Richard L. Roudebush Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Indianapolis, Indiana)
  • Started adoption on 02/2021.
KY: Troy Bowling Campus (Lexington Cooper)
  • Started adoption on 01/2021.
LA: New Orleans VA Medical Center (New Orleans) MA: Jamaica Plain VA Medical Center (Jamaica Plain)
  • Started adoption on 12/2020.
MN: Minneapolis VA Medical Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
  • Started adoption on 01/2021.
MO: Kansas City VA Medical Center (Kansas City, Missouri) MS: Biloxi VA Medical Center (Biloxi) NE: Omaha VA Medical Center (Omaha, Nebraska) NJ: East Orange VA Medical Center (East Orange) NV: Ioannis A. Lougaris Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Reno) NY: Brooklyn VA Medical Center (Brooklyn) NY: Buffalo VA Medical Center (Buffalo, New York) NY: Northport VA Medical Center (Northport) NY: Samuel S. Stratton Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Albany, New York) NY: Syracuse VA Medical Center (Syracuse) OH: Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Cleveland, Ohio)
  • Started adoption on 05/2021.
PA: Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
PA: James E. Van Zandt Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Altoona) PA: Pittsburgh VA Medical Center-University Drive (Pittsburgh) PA: Wilkes-Barre VA Medical Center (Wilkes-Barre)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
SC: Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Columbia, South Carolina) TN: Lt. Col. Luke Weathers, Jr. VA Medical Center (Memphis)
  • Started adoption on 02/2020.
TN: Nashville VA Medical Center (Nashville)
  • Started adoption on 07/2021.
TX: Dallas VA Medical Center (Dallas)
  • Started adoption on 08/2021.
TX: Michael E. DeBakey Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston)
  • Started adoption on 02/2021.
WI: Clement J. Zablocki Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Milwaukee, Wisconsin)
  • Started adoption on 09/2020.
WI: William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans' Hospital (Madison)
  • Started adoption on 10/2020.

AR: John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans' Hospital (Little Rock, Arkansas) CA: Fresno VA Medical Center (Fresno)
  • Started adoption on 03/2021.
CA: Martinez VA Medical Center (Martinez)
  • Started adoption on 06/2021.
CA: Sacramento VA Medical Center (Sacramento)
  • Started adoption on 06/2021.
CA: Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center (Long Beach) CT: West Haven VA Medical Center (West Haven) GA: Charlie Norwood Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Augusta Downtown) IL: Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center (North Chicago) IN: Fort Wayne VA Medical Center (Fort Wayne)
  • Started adoption on 02/2021.
LA: Overton Brooks Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Shreveport) ME: Togus VA Medical Center (Togus) MI: John D. Dingell Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Detroit)
  • Started adoption on 05/2021.
MI: Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (Ann Arbor)
  • Started adoption on 05/2021.
MI: Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility (Iron Mountain) NC: Durham VA Medical Center (Durham)
  • Started adoption on 02/2021.
NC: W.G. (Bill) Hefner Salisbury Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Salisbury)
  • Started adoption on 01/2021.
NH: Manchester VA Medical Center (Manchester) NM: Raymond G. Murphy Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Albuquerque) NY: James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Bronx) OH: Cincinnati VA Medical Center (Cincinnati, Ohio)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
OH: Dayton VA Medical Center (Dayton)
  • Started adoption on 05/2021.
OK: Oklahoma City VA Medical Center (Oklahoma City) PA: Coatesville VA Medical Center (Coatesville) PA: Lebanon VA Medical Center (Lebanon)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
PR: San Juan VA Medical Center (San Juan)
  • Started adoption on 04/2021.
SC: Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Charleston, South Carolina) TX: Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans' Hospital (San Antonio, Texas)
  • Started adoption on 07/2021.
TX: Harlingen VA Clinic (Harlingen) UT: George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Salt Lake City) VA: Richmond VA Medical Center (Richmond, Virginia) WA: Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Spokane, Washington)
  • Started adoption on 12/2019.
WV: Hershel "Woody" Williams VA Medical Center (Huntington, West Virginia) WV: Louis A. Johnson Veterans' Administration Medical Center (Clarksburg)

There are no unsuccessful adoptions for this innovation.

Implementation

Timeline

  • 1-2 months
    Process Buildout
    -Identify pilot service line(s)
    -Train personnel to administer RAI
    -Locate RAI Template in CPRS and review the overview PowerPoint.
    -Engage with local leadership and stakeholders to gain buy-in
    -Reach out to VHASurgicalPause@va.gov for additional support in this phase if needed.
  • 1-2 months
    Implement RAI screening in clinic(s)
  • 3-6 months
    Validate RAI in local population to garner clinical support
  • 3-6 months
    Select appropriate interventions (e.g. interdisciplinary review, preoperative palliative care, or exercise) and build consensus
  • 6-9 months
    Begin interventions for patients identified as potentially "frail"
  • 9-12 months
    Program evaluation/measure outcomes
  • 9-12 months
    Bring on additional service/sections

Departments

  • Anesthesia
  • Geriatrics
  • Nursing services
  • Palliative and hospice care
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • Primary care
  • Surgery

Core Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • Surgeon Champion: 2-4 hours/week for the first 3 months to establish program; then 1-2 hours/week indefinitely to review frail cases
  • Nurse Champion: 1-2 hours/week for the first 3 months to establish procedure for measuring RAI; then intermittent maintenance.
  • Data Manager: 1-2 hours/week for first 3 months to establish procedure for data aggregation and analysis. After establishing procedures, time commitment limited to generating periodic reports of process and outcome measures.
PROCESSES
  • Surgical Pause Implementation Guide
TOOLS
  • Online RAI calculation tool (provided free of charge and embedded in CPRS Template)
  • CPRS VA RAI FRAILTY TOOL Template
  • Health Factors: VA RAI FRAILTY SCORE and VA RAI FRAILTY SCORE WITHOUT CANCER

Files

Links

Optional Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • Multidisciplinary Review Board: 1 hour/week to review cases. Representation from surgery, anesthesia, geriatrics, PM&R, primary care and palliative care are possibilities)
  • Goal Clarification: 1-2 hours/week to conduct patient consultation to clarify goals. Personnel should have expertise in communication and value elicitation (e.g., palliative care or equivalent)

Files

Support Resources

Resource type Resource description
TOOLS
  • Numerous Publications

Files

Links

Risks and mitigations

Risk Mitigation
Not using the RAI (Risk Analysis Index) tool consistently. Make it part of new training and create leadership in asking for it everytime.
Slightly increased burden on nurses during clinic inpatient procedures. Use CPRS RAI Template to reduce burden and adjust other clinical duties as needed.
Implementing RAI too late in the journey to the operating room; it is hard to change plans after surgery is scheduled. Ensure that the RAI is measured before scheduling surgery, ideally on initial presentation to the surgery clinic and before meeting the surgeon.

Contact

Comment

Comments and replies are disabled for retired innovations and non-VA users.

VA User (Ophthalmology NP) posted

Do you have the RAI questions (toolkit) for others to use?

1
VA User (RN) posted

Is there a way I can print this out in PDF format?

VA User (Clinical Application Coordinator) deleted

This comment has been deleted.

VA User (CPRS Clinical Applications Coordinator) deleted

This comment has been deleted.

VA User (QPS Specialist) Innovation owner posted

This is such a great tool and the Implementation guide is wonderful.

Email

Email with questions about this innovation.

About

Origin story

As soon as Dr. Jason Johanning assumed leadership as Chief of Surgery at the VA Medical Center in Omaha, NE, he had an urgent problem to solve: Postoperative mortality at his center had been well above normal for over a year. Dr. Johanning followed his clinical intuition that older frail patients were experiencing disproportionately poor outcomes. He revised ... As soon as Dr. Jason Johanning assumed leadership as Chief of Surgery at the VA Medical Center in Omaha, NE, he had an urgent problem to solve: Postoperative mortality at his center had been well above normal for over a year. Dr. Johanning followed his clinical intuition that older frail patients were experiencing disproportionately poor outcomes. He revised an existing frailty measure to apply to the surgical setting and made it mandatory for scheduling elective surgery. Based on the frailty score he would review the charts of the highest risk patients to optimize decision-making, coordinate anesthetic plans, and clarify goals through preoperative palliative care consultation. These interventions cut mortality among the frail from 25% to 8%. The mortality problem was more than solved: his center improved so much that mortality fell to unusually low levels, sustaining this high performance year over year.

Original team

Daniel Hall

Surgeon

Jason Johanning

Chief of Surgery

Shipra Arya

Surgeon

Myrick Shinall

Surgeon

Nader Massarweh

Surgeon

Thomas Lynch

Surgeon

Thomas Edes

Director, Comprehensive Geriatrics & Palliative Care

Scott Shreve

National Director of Hospice Palliative Care

Mark Wilson

Chief of Surgery, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System