U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
Skip to main content

Last updated

Kicking CAUTI Campaign

Share Print

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a benign and extremely common condition in Veterans in acute and long-term care and does not merit antibiotic treatment. Unfortunately, most healthcare providers confuse bladder colonization (ASB) with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with urinary catheters, thus leading to overdiagnosis of CAUTI. Antibiotics given for ASB can cause harm to the Veteran receiving them, in terms of causing adverse side effects, C. diff colitis, or inducing resistant superbugs that can cause future infections. Overdiagnosis of CAUTI falsely elevates facilities’ healthcare associated infection rates. Our intervention helps reduce testing for and treatment of ASB with antibiotics, thus also saving VHA resources, while reducing CAUTI rates. Reducing CAUTI rates can lead to improved SAIL metrics for a facility.

This innovation is replicating across multiple facilities as its impact continues to be validated. See more replicating innovations.

Adoptions:

5 successful

Awards and Recognition:

VA HSR&R IIR funding (09-104 and 16-025), VA HSR&D Best Research Paper of the Year 2016 | https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/awards/bestpaper2016.cfm

Partners:

Diffusion of Excellence, Health Services Research & Development

Contact Team

Overview

Problem

The evidence base for neither screening for nor treating ASB is very strong, yet more than 70% of VA inpatients with ASB received antibiotics to treat it. The problem starts with seemingly innocuous lab tests—urine cultures and urinalyses—performed in patients without specific urinary symptoms. The results of these tests lead to reflexive use of antibiotic ... See more

Solution

We developed an intervention to help providers apply evidence-based, best practices guidelines on asymptomatic bacteriuria to their patients, at the point of care. These guidelines encourage providers to consider whether the patient has ASB, rather than UTI, and to think more deeply into what could be causing the patient’s symptoms, rather than reflexively o ... See more

Results

The Kicking CAUTI intervention led to a 71% reduction in screening for ASB and a 75% reduction in treatment of ASB at the Houston VA Medical Center, the initial site of implementation. We have since rolled it out to four additional VAMCs. To date, our four intervention sites have logged a total 466 intervention sessions, reaching 2,037 medical providers in ... See more

Links

Metrics

  • The Kicking CAUTI intervention led to a 71% reduction in screening for ASB and a 75% reduction in treatment of ASB at the Houston VA Medical Center, the initial site of implementation.

Diffusion tracker

Does not include Clinical Resource Hubs (CRH)

Statuses

CA: West Los Angeles VA Medical Center (West Los Angeles)
  • Started adoption on 05/2019, ended on 06/2020.
FL: Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Miami)
  • Started adoption on 02/2019, ended on 06/2020.
MI: Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (Ann Arbor)
  • Started adoption on 06/2019, ended on 06/2020.
MN: Minneapolis VA Medical Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
  • Started adoption on 02/2019, ended on 06/2020.
TX: Michael E. DeBakey Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston)
  • Started adoption on 04/2010, ended on 07/2012.

There are no in-progress adoptions for this innovation.

There are no unsuccessful adoptions for this innovation.

Multimedia

Images

Dr. Barbara Trautner delivers a Kicking UTI intervention session at Grand Rounds, Minneapolis VAMC September 2019

Side 1 of the Kicking UTI algorithm card

Side 2 of the Kicking UTI algorithm card

Implementation

Timeline

  • Months 1-3 On-Ramp
    Identify the local team, determine which units are the focus of the intervention, achieve buy-in from leadership and stakeholders, work with external facilitators to establish access to outcomes data in VINCI, complete on-ramp training modules. Collect baseline data (both in VINCI and by chart review). Local teams would typically include a physician champion and a pharmacist, with the addition of a nurse practitioner or nurse educator if available. Local teams may wish to have both an infectious diseases physician and a hospitalist physician to increase reach. Participate in monthly calls with other participating sites to share best practices.
  • Months 4-9 Active Intervention
    Deliver case-based education using the library of teaching cases in a wide variety of settings on the relevant units, with the relevant healthcare providers. During each session, share the algorithm with all participants (on paper or electronically). Intervention delivery options include team rounds, in-services, educational conferences, grand rounds, online chat (via Teams), and 1:1 detailing. Continue to collect data via case collection, while the external facilitation team will continue to gather data on outcomes available in VINCI. Continue to participate in monthly calls with other participating sites.
  • Months 10-12 Sustainability
    Work with external facilitation team to summarize and report data. Share lessons learned with the practice community. Integrate the intervention and the algorithm into ongoing workflow, either electronically, or as part of orientation, or as part of a quarterly education session.

Departments

  • Emergency care
  • Pharmacy
  • Geriatrics
  • Quality control
  • Infectious disease
  • Internal medicine

Core Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • The local team needs to include a physician champion (usually an infectious diseases physician or a hospitalist) and a pharmacist. Each would expect to spend 1-2 hours per week on the intervention.
PROCESSES
  • The local team needs to deliver case-based audit and feedback using the case library and algorithm.
TOOLS
  • The essential tools are our library of teaching cases and our pocket card algorithm.

Files

Optional Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • A nurse practitioner or nurse educator can greatly improve participation by nursing staff. Involving a geriatrician, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant from the long-term care units can also increase impact in long-term care. Each would expect to spend 1-2 hours per week on the intervention.
PROCESSES
  • Participation in nursing fairs and posting flyers and posters in nursing units that feature the algorithm both help generate awareness and extend the reach of the intervention. Another optional process that helps with sustainability would be to modify the online microbiology lab order set to discourage urine cultures in patients with ASB.
TOOLS
  • We have a variety of data collection tools; their use depends on how much effort the local team has to measure and log outcomes. For example, we can track the budget impact of the intervention, if the local team is willing to log time spent on the intervention.

Files

  • VHA directive specifying infection control and preventions programs in VA VHA Directive 1131
  • VHA 1031 mandate specifying the provision of antibiotic stewardship programs in the VA VHA 1031 Mandate

Risks and mitigations

Risk Mitigation
Some complexity to implement Implementation workbook, with detailed models of implementation materials is available
Buy-in from multiple stakeholders needed VHA directive 1031 requires all facilities to have an antibiotic stewardship program
Decreasing CAUTI rates will improve SAIL metrics
Lack of time and competing priorities for local team VHA directive 1131 mandates staffing for infectious diseases and infection prevention programs at each facility

Contact

Comment

Comments and replies are disabled for retired innovations and non-VA users.

Email

Email with questions about this innovation.

About

Origin story

Dr. Trautner, VA infectious diseases physician, attended a conference on preventing medical device-related infections in June 2008. One of the speakers announced that on October 1, 2008, Medicare would no longer pay hospitals for certain hospital-acquired conditions, including CAUTI, because these events in theory could be prevented by application of eviden ... Dr. Trautner, VA infectious diseases physician, attended a conference on preventing medical device-related infections in June 2008. One of the speakers announced that on October 1, 2008, Medicare would no longer pay hospitals for certain hospital-acquired conditions, including CAUTI, because these events in theory could be prevented by application of evidence-based guidelines. Dr. Trautner was electrified, because she recognized that a high percentage of what is diagnosed and reported as CAUTI is really asymptomatic bacteriuria. She started thinking about how she could teach providers the difference between ASB and CAUTI, and how she could help them learn when to withhold urine cultures and antibiotics in patients with ASB. Sitting there in the 2nd row of the conference auditorium, she began to type up a proposal. The proposal was eventually funded by VA HSR&D as investigator-initiated research, and thus the Kicking CAUTI campaign was born.

Original team

Barbara Trautner, M.D., Ph.D

Infectious diseases clinician-investigator

Larisa Grigoryan, M.D.,Ph.D

Epidemiologist

Aanand D. Naik

Geriatrician and quality improvement scientist

P. Adam Kelly, Ph.D

Psychometrician

Nancy Petersen, Ph.D

Senior biostatistician

Sylvia Hysong, Ph.D

Industrial and organizational psychologist