U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
Skip to main content
4 photos depicting various military environmental toxic exposures. Photo of chemicals draining into a water source through large drainpipes, photo of a soldier in combat gear working on munitions in a field, photo of soldier wearing a gas mask with yellow gas around, photo of 2 soldiers dressed in firefighter gear spraying fire-fighting foam.

Last updated

Military Environmental Exposure Non-Registry Template

Share Print

The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxins (PACT) Act requires all enrolled Veterans to complete a Toxic Exposure Screening (TES). Almost 30% of screened Veterans request a referral to Environmental Health for a toxic exposure assessment and approximately 1 out of 4 endorse a non-registry toxic exposure and do not meet eligibility criteria for a formal registry. While Environmental Health staff have a standard template to capture toxic exposure assessments for the Airborne Hazard and Open Burn Pit registry, there was no standardized method to capture non-registry toxic exposure referrals such as Camp Lejeune, asbestos, lead, and all other in-garrison exposures. Establishing a non-registry template provides a standardized tool to address the many different types of military-related non-registry exposures that millions of Veterans have experienced.

This innovation is replicating across multiple facilities as its impact continues to be validated. See more replicating innovations.

Origin:

March 2023, Dayton VA Medical Center

Adoptions:

4 successful

Partners:

Academic Affiliations

Contact Team

Overview

Problem

Almost 25% of Veterans completing a Toxic Exposure Screening (TES) endorsed exposure to toxins during military service (such as Camp Lejeune contaminated water, asbestos, "other", etc.) but did not qualify for formal documentation within a VA Registry. National TES data shows that of the 4 million Veterans that have been screened, 43% report a toxic exposur ... See more

Images

Pie chart showing reported toxic exposure breakdown at the national level.  
-37%, or 855,696 Veterans, report exposure to Burn Pits
-27%, or 635,723 Veterans, report exposure to Agent Orange
- 15%, or 354,594 Veterans, report exposure to "other" toxins
-7%, or 173,085 Veterans, report exposure to Gulf War
-7%, 166,381 Veterans, report exposure to Camp Lejeune 
-7%, 154,054 Veterans, report exposure to Radiation

Endorsed Exposures from National Toxic Exposure Screening Report

Solution

VISN 10 established a standard process to document, track, and address all non–registry toxic exposure assessments by developing a CPRS progress note template and standardized clinic coding. This effort originated in Dayton and was developed, approved, and implemented at 10 VAMCs within VISN 10 (excluding 1 VAMC using Cerner) and allows facilities to consist ... See more

Results

Implementing the new Non-registry template allowed clinicians to document and address Veterans exposure concerns for those that did not qualify for formal, standardized documentation within a VA Registry. Clinicians were able to also document a toxic exposure assessment and education provided to the Veteran. These non-registry templates increased productiv ... See more

Images

Table showing completed Non-Registry Toxic Exposure Assessments, showing data for 4 facilities for the past 6 months (March to August) with VISN totals.
-Cleveland VAMC has completed a total of 170 assessments
-Dayton VAMC has completed a total of 507
-Northern Indiana has completed a total of 160 assessments
-Saginaw completed a total of 633 assessments
-VISN10 completed a total of 1,470 non-registry toxic exposure assessments.

Completed Non-Registry Toxic Exposure Assessments, March - August 2023

Metrics

  • The Non-Registry toxic exposure template has been actively utilized in 4 stations across VISN10 for the past 6 months. From March to August, the 4 facilities completed 1,470 non-registry toxic exposure assessments and documented Veterans concerns. Without this template, those 1,470 Veterans would not have had an assessment and had their concerns captured in a manner that may also be used by other stakeholders as VACO, WRIISC, and DoD. Veterans were able to be educated on their exposures, thus improving the Veteran experience while supporting VA’s core “I CARE” values.

Diffusion tracker

Does not include Clinical Resource Hubs (CRH)

Statuses

There are no in-progress adoptions for this innovation.

There are no unsuccessful adoptions for this innovation.

Implementation

Timeline

  • 1-2 weeks
    Installation of template/note by local Clinical Application Coordinator (CAC)
  • 1-2 weeks
    Set up of non-registry clinic profile/grids
  • 2-4 weeks
    Environmental Health clinician/coordinator training

Departments

  • Administration
  • Telehealth
  • Patient services
  • Information management
  • Primary care
  • Registry exams

Core Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • Clinical Application Coordinator – to install template, 1-2 hours
  • Patient Business Service – to set up clinic/stop codes, 1-2 hours
  • Environmental Health coordinator – to schedule appointments/reports, 20-40 hours per week, ongoing
  • Environmental Health clinician – to conduct evaluations/complete template, 20-40 hours per week, ongoing
PROCESSES
  • Facility Environmental Health clinician(s) and Environmental Health coordinator(s) would need to complete toxic exposure trainings and become familiar with this template.
TOOLS
  • Non-Registry Toxic Exposure Template - to be uploaded into CPRS

Support Resources

Resource type Resource description
PEOPLE
  • Environmental Health clinician/coordinator (to provide training)
PROCESSES
  • training for staff
TOOLS
  • Non-Registry Toxic Exposure Template

Risks and mitigations

Risk Mitigation
Not enough local resources available (environmental health clinicians) to address toxic exposure concerns/assessments Cross training clinicians, utilizing CRH, hiring additional Environmental Health/toxic exposure staff, OT clinics,

Contact

Comment

Comments and replies are disabled for retired innovations and non-VA users.

VA User (Research) posted

Hello - I am currently leading an evaluation of the impact of legislation related to toxins and how it affects Veterans seeking health care and disability. We are focused on two groups 1) camp Lejeune, and 2) PACT Act eligible Veterans. would be interested in learning more about what you are doing, where the data is going, etc. One of the biggest compliants I hear is that there is no registry for Camp Lejeune.

Email

Email with questions about this innovation.

About

Origin story

The PACT Act was approved in August 2022, part of which required that all enrolled Veterans receive a Toxic Exposure Screening (TES) and be referred to other local resources for any toxic exposure questions and concerns. These referrals results in a surge in demand for Environmental Health services across the country, and VA facilities across the country be ... The PACT Act was approved in August 2022, part of which required that all enrolled Veterans receive a Toxic Exposure Screening (TES) and be referred to other local resources for any toxic exposure questions and concerns. These referrals results in a surge in demand for Environmental Health services across the country, and VA facilities across the country became inundated with Registry and “non-registry’ military toxic exposure concerns. These “non-registry” referrals were the exposure concerns that did not meet the eligibility criteria for a formal VA mandated registry program (such as Agent Orange registry Airborne Hazards/Open Burn Pit Registry), but were still part of the PACT Act Law. The largest example of the non–registry referrals is Camp Lejeune contaminated water exposure concerns. We realized we had to develop a way to efficiently evaluate and address this type of “non–registry” referral. We developed a CPRS template tailored to evaluate these non–registry toxic exposure referrals, which standardizes the non-registry evaluation. This template, along with clinic coding guidelines, were approved by our VISN leadership, and the template installed at our 10 VAMCs across the VISN; the 11th VAMC is using Cerner.

Original team

Marc Rohner

Supervisory Program Specialist (IDES Manager)

Forrest Fornash

Physician Assistant/ Dayton VA Lead Environmental Health Clinician

Lana Davila

Program Management Officer, VISN10/CRH